Tuesday, August 16, 2016


By Cash Michaels

            The family of a 20-year-old black man who was fatally shot while walking by the home of a white Raleigh homeowner is demanding justice, saying that the gunman had no right to pull the trigger because neither nor his family were ever at risk.
            Published reports confirm that Kouren-Rodney Bernard Thomas was just attending a party in the Northeast Neuse Crossing neighborhood on the evening of August 7 when he and some friends decided to leave. They carried no weapons, and walked on no one else’s property as they left.
            However, to neighbor Chad Cameron Copley, 39, Thomas and his friends were “frigging black males outside my frigging house with firearms” and also abunch of hoodlums.” He told the police dispatcher he needed to scare them off with his shotgun from in front of his Singleleaf Lane address. Copley allegedly fired once through his garage window, fatally hitting Thomas.
            Copley contended that the group in front of his home was rowdy, cursing and threatening, thus the warning shot. None of the witnesses to the shooting or the events leading up to it confirmed Copley’s version.
            Copley as charged with first-degree murder and remanded without bond.
            Days later, at a press conference by the Thomas family and their attorney,  Justin Bamberg, Copley was called “George Zimmerman 2.0” after the infamous killer of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida several years ago when the black youth was innocently walking home one night.
            The Thomas family said there was “nothing ‘hood’ about him, and there was  no evidence that he was doing anything other than walking home from the party that night peacefully, not disturbing anyone.
            Attorney Bamberg vowed that the family will seek justice in the courts.  
            Kouren’s distraught mother cried, “ I don’t have him no more, and there’s nothing I can do. There’s nothing I can do.”


By Cash Michaels
Contributing writer

Once again the US Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that North Carolina’s Republican-led General Assembly has illegally employed race to ensure partisan, yet unconstitutional outcomes. This time, it was nine state senate districts and 19 NC House districts of the state’s 170 legislative districts that the three-judge panel ruled were racially-gerrymandered in absence of any compelling state interests.
It’s called “stacking and packing,” where Democratic black voters were drawn into majority-minority districts for the sole purpose removing them from swing districts so that white Republicans could easily defeat white Democrats.
Those legislative maps have already been used in two prior elections, and will be used again for the upcoming November 8th general election because there isn’t time to redraw them, the federal appellate court said. But when the NC General Assembly goes back into session next January, the court has ordered it to redraw the voting districts so that the maps comply constitutionally for the 2018 elections.
Democrats statewide weren’t surprised, but they were outraged.
“This Republican legislature has broken a record enacting the highest number of unconstitutional laws ever, and all of them are raced-based,” Eric Ellison, chairman of the Forsyth County Democratic Party  said in blunt terms. “They’re a bunch of racists, and our courts agree with us. These guys are underhanded, they don’t believe in the Constitution,  they don’t believe in fairness, they don’t believe in democracy. They’re a bunch of crooks, and it’s time to get them out of office, and get new leadership in there, and the time to do it is now!”
Thirty-one North Carolina voters sued the NC legislature in May, 2015 in federal court, claiming that the 2011 district maps unnecessarily increased the number of black voters in 28 districts under the guise of complying with the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Blacks and whites were already in coalition electing black candidates of their choice in those districts.
State Sen. Floyd McKissick Jr. was one of those black lawmakers who previously enjoyed strong support from a racial coalition of support which included 42 percent  of black voters from Durham and Granville County. But his district lines were suddenly changed in 2011 to where he had over 50 percent black voters in his district.
Indeed, prior to 2011, not one state Senate district represented by an African-American had a majority of black voters, because it wasn’t necessary.      The 2015 federal lawsuit charged that the 2011 Republican redistricting was just a ruse to feign compliance with the 1965 VRA in order to gain political advantage.
“They were just packing African-Americans into those districts, and making it more likely that Republicans would win the other ones,” Sen. McKissick said.
When state lawmakers return in January, their first order of business will be to redraw the 28 legislative districts so that they are in constitutional compliance, McKissick says.  The legislature can still draw majority-minority districts, just as long as it can legally demonstrate candidates are more likely to be elected because of race, observers say.

No comments:

Post a Comment